Microbiota-derived 3-IAA (indole-3-acetic acid) influences chemotherapy efficacy in pancreatic cancer

COMMENTED ARTICLE - ADULTS’ SECTION

By Pr. Harry Sokol
Gastroenterology and Nutrition Department, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Paris, France

Commentary on the article by Tintelnot et al. Nature 2023 [1]

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is expected to become the second most deadly cancer by 2040, owing to the high incidence of metastatic disease and limited responses to treatment. Less than half of all patients respond to the primary treatment for PDAC, and genetic alterations alone cannot explain sufficiently the different responses. Diet is an environmental factor that can influence the response to therapies, but its role in PDAC is unclear. Here, using shotgun metagenomic sequencing and metabolomic screening, the authors showed that the microbiota-derived tryptophan metabolite indole-3-acetic acid (3-IAA) is enriched in patients who respond to treatment. Faecal microbiota transplantation, dietary manipulation of tryptophan and oral 3-IAA administration increase the efficacy of chemotherapy in humanised mouse models of PDAC. Using a combination of loss- and gain-of-function experiments, the authors showed that the efficacy of 3-IAA and chemotherapy requires the presence of neutrophil-derived myeloperoxidase (MPO). MPO oxidises 3-IAA which, in combination with chemotherapy induces a downregulation of the reactive oxygen species (ROS)-degrading enzymes glutathione peroxidase 3 and glutathione peroxidase 7. This all results in the accumulation of ROS and the downregulation of autophagy in cancer cells, which compromises their metabolic fitness and, ultimately, their proliferation. In humans, the authors observed a significant correlation between 3-IAA levels and the efficacy of therapy in two independent PDAC cohorts. In summary, the authors identified a microbiota-derived metabolite that has clinical implications in the treatment of PDAC, and provided a motivation for considering nutritional interventions when treating cancer patients.

What do we already know about this subject?

Polychemotherapy, either with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), irinotecan and oxaliplatin in combination with folinic acid (FOLFIRINOX), or with gemcitabine and nabpaclitaxel (GnP), is considered the standard of care for patients suffering from metastatic PDAC (mPDAC). However, less than half of all patients are responsive to the therapy, and patients who do not respond (NR, non-responder patients) suffer pain and die within a few weeks. Genetic alterations in PDAC poorly explain the differences between patients who respond to therapy (R, responder patients) and NR patients, which leaves environmental factors, including the intestinal microbiota, as the potential mediators of chemotherapy efficacy. Thus, there is an urgent need to identify environmental factors that might explain the differences between R and NR patients to develop new concepts for future therapies. The intestinal microbiota has been shown to induce a response to immunotherapy in patients with melanoma, and can be modulated by the diet 2, 3 . In rare long-term survivor patients with localised PDAC, bacteria can pass from the intestine to the tumour and thus control anti-tumour immune activation. However, most patients suffering from aggressive immunotherapy-resistant mPDAC are treated with polychemotherapy, and it is presently unclear whether and how the microbiota or dietary habits affect the efficacy 4 .

Image
Key points
  • The intestinal microbiota is different in PDAC patients who are responders and non-responders to chemotherapy
  • The tryptophan metabolite 3-IAA, produced by the microbiota, is enriched in responder patients
  • 3-IAA increases the efficacy of chemotherapy by boosting ROS production by neutrophils and decreasing autophagy in cancer cells

What are the main insights from this study?

Analysing the microbiota of 30 mPDAC patients revealed differences between R and NR patients. Transferring the microbiota of R patients to mice with pancreatic tumours reduced the size of the tumours after chemotherapy. The tryptophan metabolite 3-IAA was enriched in R patients and mice with R microbiota, potentially contributing to the response to chemotherapy. The administration of 3-IAA increased the efficacy of chemotherapy in mice (figure 1). The analysis of immune cells in mice showed an increase in CD8+ T cells and a reduction in neutrophils in mice with a microbiota associated with a good response to chemotherapy. 3-IAA affected the MPO of neutrophils, thereby reducing their survival. The combination of 3-IAA and chemotherapy reduced the number of neutrophils and inhibited tumour growth, with MPO playing a crucial role. It is suggested that MPO induces the ROS production leading to cell death during chemotherapy. In-vitro experiments have shown that 3-IAA increases ROS levels. This effect was confirmed in vivo and the inhibition of ROS by N-acetylcysteine abolished the efficacy of FIRINOX in mice with high 3-IAA levels. The authors then showed that the effect of 3-IAA was linked to downregulation of autophagy. Finally, high serum concentrations of 3-IAA were correlated to a reduction in neutrophil counts and improved survival in the two cohorts of human patients.

What are the consequences in practice?

The intestinal microbiota has an effect on chemotherapy responses. The mechanisms involved in this study demonstrates the role of microbial metabolites, particularly tryptophan metabolites. Among these, 3-IAA is not only a predictive marker of response to chemotherapy in PDAC, but could also offer an adjuvant therapeutic drug.

CONCLUSION

The intestinal microbiota has an effect on chemotherapy responses in PDAC. One of its metabolites, 3-IAA, is a predictor of a good response to chemotherapy and enhances its effect by inducing an accumulation of ROS and reducing autophagy in cancer cells.

Image
Summary
Off
Sidebar
Off
Migrated content
Désactivé
Updated content
Désactivé
Hide image
Off
Commented article Pancreatic cancer

Gut microbiome and antimicrobial resistance

By Dr. Joseph Nesme

Assistant professor, Section of Microbiology, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Antibiotic resistance is ancient and prevalent and the environmental resistome is a reservoir of resistance genes fueling the antimicrobial resistance silent pandemic. Horizontal gene transfer, population dynamics and co-selection accelerate emergence and dissemination of the resistome and by year 2050, more than 10 million death per year will be due to antibiotic resistance. The early colonization of the gut microbiome is prone to dysbiosis that can lead to increased abundance and diversity of the gut resistome of infants. Adopting a One Health approach, considering the interconnectedness of human health, animal health, and the environment, is essential for addressing the complex challenges posed by AR.

Antibiotic resistance in the environment: A pre-existing challenge

Antibiotic resistance (AR) is an ancient and prevalent phenomenon in the environment existing long before the introduction of antibiotic molecules as therapeutic. The environment serves as a vast reservoir of antibiotic resistance genes with diverse microbial communities harboring resistance mechanisms. AR has been found in various environmental settings, including soil, water, plants, animals, and even in 30,000 years old Arctic permafrost 1, 2 . The ecological role of antibiotic molecules and associated resistance in non-clinical settings remains unclear but highlights the fact that a readily available pool of genes predates clinical antibiotic usage and explain rapid emergence in pathogens. The current antibiotic crisis is an evolutionary phenomenon and mitigation strategies needs to account for microbial ecology. It is the rapid acquisition of resistance by pathogens that were previously sensitive leading to therapy failures that is problematic, especially when very few novel antimicrobials are expected to reach the market 3 .

Mechanisms driving the emergence and dissemination of the resistome

The resistome refers to the complete set of genes that encode for antibiotic resistance (AR)-related proteins or those proteins that could potentially evolve into powerful AR agents 4 (figure 1). This includes recognized AR genes in pathogenic bacteria (the problematic ones), AR genes from antibiotic-producing organisms, such as Streptomyces spp. producing streptomycin antibiotic and associated resistance gene[5], cryptic AR genes (i.e., genes that could provide resistance in a different genetic setting; e.g., upregulated efflux pumps or downregulated porins), and precursor AR genes that code proteins with a minimal level of affinity or resistance to antibiotic compounds.

It is noteworthy that a considerable portion of these gene subsets overlap due sequences homology, indicating they likely have a shared evolutionary background.

Image

The notion of resistome is distinct from “functional and clinically relevant AR” important. Indeed, resistome genes can transition between the different states described above by horizontal gene transfer (HGT), point mutations, or recombination which are leading to new hosts or genetic context where clinically relevant AR phenotype can be expressed. A resistance gene is therefore not problematic per se as this is host and genetic context dependent, but all resistome genes are potential threat with different associated public health risk outcomes. The discovery of a resistance gene towards a clinically relevant molecule, located on a mobile element and hosted by a human pathogen is a critical risk but the same gene, or close homologues, found in a non-pathogenic soil bacterium and not associated with mobile genetic element is a very low risk ARG. Ranking risk of antibiotic resistance in resistome studies is therefore of paramount.

Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) is a key mechanism responsible for the rapid spread of AR genes among bacteria, even across distant lineages. For example, Bacteroides spp., a predominant group in the human gut microbiota, possess macrolide resistance gene ermB identical to those found in several Clostridium perfringens, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Enterococcus faecalis isolates from various geographical origin, indicating genetic connection between Bacteroides and some Gram-positive bacteria that are not prevalent in the human gut . Genetic elements, such as plasmids, facilitate the transfer of resistance genes between different microbial species . HGT enables the dissemination of genes across diverse environments and bacterial populations, contributing to the overall prevalence and diversity of AR. Co-selection is another significant factor in the spread of AR. The use of non-antibiotic compounds, such as heavy metals and biocides, can co-select for AR genes by exerting selective pressures on microbial populations, either by co-resistance (different resistance determinants present on the same genetic element) and cross-resistance (the same genetic determinant responsible for resistance to antibiotics and metals) 8 . Exposure to naturally occurring antimicrobial compounds such as those produced by competing microorganisms or any co-selective compounds can drive the selection of resistant strains 9 . The presence of antibiotics in the environment, either from natural sources or human activities, further contributes to the selection pressure for resistance. Additionally, the use of antibiotics in agriculture and veterinary practices can lead to the contamination of the environment, promoting the emergence and spread of antibiotic environmental resistance genes overtime 10 .

Understanding barriers and trends to the transfers of genetic vectors harboring resistance genes is crucial to devise eco-evolutionary informed mitigations strategies to limit the dissemination of AR in the early life and in general in clinical settings.

Dysbiosis and the gut resistome in infants: A delicate balance

The environmental reservoir diversity of AR genes and its potential to be transfered poses a threat to the early life human gut microbiome. Strategies such as improved wastewater treatment, responsible use of antibiotics in agriculture and veterinary medicine, and reducing environmental contamination with antibiotic residues and antibiotic resistant bacteria can help mitigate the spread of resistance 11 . Additionally, monitoring and surveillance of environmental reservoirs can provide valuable insights into the emergence and persistence of AR and inform public health interventions.

Adopting a One Health approach, considering the interconnectedness of human health, animal health, and the environment, is essential for addressing the complex challenges posed by AR.

Image

Our gut is rapidly colonized after birth by microorganisms acquired from their mothers and their surrounding environment. It is during the first years of life that changes are drastic and characterized by a low resilience compared to the more stable healthy adult’s gut microbiome. Newborns and infants are therefore more prone to disruptions in microbial communities, known as dysbiosis. During that period, many factors can influence and perturbate gut maturation and potentially lead to long-term consequence on health 12 . Mice studies showed that during this critical developmental window, rather than a direct effect of antibiotic molecules, it is the alteration of the gut microbiota composition that is triggering metabolic consequences, such as obesity 13 .

Unraveling the antibiotic resistome in infants gut: Insights from a large cohort study

While antibiotic resistance is problematic at all age of life, the establishment of the gut microbiome at early age represent a window of opportunity to limit the buildup of an AR genes reservoir in the gut. It is important therefore to identify the various factors increasing or reducing the abundance of AR genes that could spread to infectious pathogens and cause antibiotic therapy failure throughout life. To study the global human gut resistome researchers rely on holistic approaches interrogating both species presence and genomes functional potential, including the antibiotic resistome. Researchers rely on environmental DNA extraction from proxy samples (e.g., stool samples for the gut) followed by untargeted high-throughput sequencing (shotgun metagenomics). Approximately 80% of human gut bacterial species detected by molecular tools are unculturable, especially the specialized anaerobes inhabiting the gut. It is likely that many microorganisms are organized in multi-species cell aggregates with metabolic co-dependencies making pure strain isolation delicate if not impossible. Using computational methods, it is however possible to reconstruct quasi-complete genomes from metagenomes and associate encoded genes with specific species or even strains of bacteria. In a recent study, researchers analyzed fecal samples from 662 infants from a cohort which followed children from birth to age 7 14 . The objectives of the study were to establish a cohort scale overview of the resistome at 1 year of age and identify perinatal and environmental factors associated with ARG abundance and diversity. The researchers used shotgun metagenomic sequencing of samples obtained at 1 year of age from the 662 children to identify ARGs and bacterial taxa present in the samples (figure 2). Making use of their large dataset, the authors were able to reconstruct Metagenomes Associated Genomes (MAGs), allowing them to confidently annotate the taxonomy of recovered genomes and their AR genes content.

A first result observed was that all children had at least one type of multiple drug ARG in their gut, indicating that even in absence of antibiotic treatment, there is a resident resistome associated with the gut microbiome. Indeed, many multidrug resistance genes were identified as efflux-pumps. These proteins are normal component of every bacterial cell but some can confer AR and are very easily co-selected by cross-resistance, for example towards heavy metals or biocides, potentially explaining their high abundance in the gut, but also in all environments 8, 15 . Another striking result was the clear separation of the cohort in two groups based on their resistome profile. The first group was characterized by a higher ARGs diversity and relative abundance with Escherichia coli as the main contributor of ARGs, as shown in (figure 2). This agrees with previous observations that Enterobacteriaceae are abundant early in life but should decrease rapidly when Bacteroidetes population starts colonizing the gut. Alteration of this maturation in some children can be associated to a combination of several factors, such as antibiotic usage, mode of delivery, rural or urban household that seems to delay the reduction of the population of Escherichia coli and lead to an increased resistome at 1 year of age. This is also confirmed by the observation that the higher abundance of ARGs is associated with a lower gut microbiome maturity score, based on ratios of specific age-related taxa 16 .

Antibiotic treatment during pregnancy and the first year of life of course had significant impact on the abundance of the infant gut resistome. A clear temporal trend could be observed between the time (more than 6 months or less) since the last antibiotic course taken by a child and the abundance of ARGs in its gut.

This indicates some level of resilience at an early age which could be potentially improved with targeted intervention, e.g., with pro- or prebiotics, and remains to be tested. At the cohort scale, the largest differences in ARG abundance were however found for resistance genes towards antibiotic that were not prescribed to the children, underlying that perinatal and environmental factors besides antibiotic therapy are also driving the gut resistome. Another observation from that study that connects the surrounding environment, and associated resistome, and the gut resistome was that children whose households was in urban areas had a significantly higher load of ARGs than children living in rural areas. There is a myriad of potential confounding factors that could explain this but it strengthens the fact that the environment contribution to the development of the early life microbiome is extremely important.

It can be hypothesized that urban living is associated with less contact with the outdoor and a decreased microbiome diversity, or that the type of lodging found in rural (house) or urban (appartement) environment are associated have consequences on the indoor microbiome as seen in bed dust.

Conclusion

Antibiotic resistance is ancient and prevalent and the environmental resistome is a reservoir of potential clinical resistance genes. Mechanisms such as horizontal gene transfer, intricate population dynamics, and co-selection effects, have been identified as significant accelerators in the evolution and spread of the antibiotic resistome making previously sensitive strains of pathogens now resistant to antibiotic therapy. The human gut microbiome and its early developmental phase is prone to dysbiosis and potential invasion, selection, and co-selection of bacteria harboring resistance genes, which can have long term health consequences. It is unclear to what extent these are related to future failed antibiotic therapies. High temporal resolution, long term multi-omics studies are needed to identify first longitudinal patterns of gut microbiome development and second, most probable routes of AR genes transfer by HGT. Together, these results will provide insights to devise preventive strategies for minimizing the development of AR already early in life and limit transfer to problematic pathogens. This effort is of the utmost importance to reduce the burden of the worldwide AMR pandemic and improve global public health by preserving the efficacy of the few antibiotic available to fight infectious diseases.

Sources

1. Nesme J, Cécillon S, Delmont TO, et al. Large-scale metagenomic-based study of antibiotic resistance in the environment. Curr Biol 2014; 24: 1096-100.
2. D’Costa VM, King CE, Kalan L, et al. Antibiotic resistance is ancient. Nature 2011; 477: 457-61.
3. Renwick MJ, Brogan DM, Mossialos E. A systematic review and critical assessment of incentive strategies for discovery and development of novel antibiotics. J Antibiot 2016; 69: 73-88.
4. Wright GD. The antibiotic resistome: the nexus of chemical and genetic diversity. Nat Rev Microbiol 2007; 5: 175-86.
5. Benveniste R, Davies J. Aminoglycoside antibiotic-inactivating enzymes in actinomycetes similar to those present in clinical isolates of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1973; 70: 2276-80.
6. Shoemaker NB, Vlamakis H, Hayes K, et al. Evidence for extensive resistance gene transfer among Bacteroides spp. and among Bacteroides and other genera in the human colon. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001; 67: 561-8.
7. Martínez JL, Coque TM, Baquero F. Prioritizing risks of antibiotic resistance genes in all metagenomes. Nat Rev Microbiol 2015; 13: 396.
8. Baker-Austin C, Wright MS, Stepanauskas R. Co-selection of antibiotic and metal resistance. Trends Microbiol 2006; 14: 176-82.
9. Wencewicz TA. Crossroads of Antibiotic Resistance and Biosynthesis. J Mol Biol 2019; 431: 3370-99.
10. Knapp CW, Dolfing J, Ehlert PA, et al. Evidence of increasing antibiotic resistance gene abundances in archived soils since 1940. Environ Sci Technol 2010; 44: 580-7.
11. Wolters B, Hauschild K, Blau K, et al. Biosolids for safe land application: does wastewater treatment plant size matters when considering antibiotics, pollutants, microbiome, mobile genetic elements and associated resistance genes? Environ Microbiol 2022; 24: 1573-89.
12. Dogra S, Sakwinska O, Soh SE, et al. Rate of establishing the gut microbiota in infancy has consequences for future health. Gut Microbes 2015; 6: 321-5.
13. Cox LM, Yamanishi S, Sohn J, et al. Altering the intestinal microbiota during a critical developmental window has lasting metabolic consequences. Cell 2014; 158: 705-21.
14. Li X, Stokholm J, Brejnrod A, et al. The infant gut resistome associates with E. coli, environmental exposures, gut microbiome maturity, and asthma-associated bacterial composition. Cell Host Microbe 2021; 29: 975-87.e4.
15. Mulder I, Siemens J, Sentek V, et al. Quaternary ammonium compounds in soil: implications for antibiotic resistance development. Rev Environ Sci Bio/Technology 2018; 17: 159-85.
16. Subramanian S, Huq S, Yatsunenko T, et al. Persistent gut microbiota immaturity in malnourished Bangladeshi children. Nature 2014; 510: 417-21.

Summary
Off
Sidebar
Off
Migrated content
Désactivé
Updated content
Désactivé
Hide image
Off
Article Gut microbiota

Is the microbiota key to the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease?

Even before patients show any clinical signs of Alzheimer’s disease, imbalances in their gut microbiota may betray its onset. Is it thus possible to detect the disease earlier?

The gut microbiota
Photo: Le microbiote, la clé du diagnostic précoce de la Maladie d'Alzheimer ?

Alzheimer’s disease is progressive and silent. During the so-called pre-clinical phase, cognitive state appears normal. However, in-depth tests have already shown the progressive accumulation of two proteins in the brain, β-amyloid (Aβ) and tau proteins, which cause brain damage and a slow degeneration of neurons, beginning in the memory center and then spreading to the rest of the brain.

An interval of at least 10 years exists between the first deposition of Aβ plaques in the brain and the first clinical signs of impairment.

After this silent phase, the first symptoms of (sidenote: Dementia Brain disorders that affect memory, thinking, behavior, and emotions. Changes in mood and behavior sometimes precede memory problems. Symptoms worsen over time. Most sufferers eventually require assistance in their day-to-day life. Sources: OMS and Alzheimer’s Disease International ) appear. This is the clinical stage of Alzheimer’s disease, marked by mood and personality changes, memory lapses, forgetting certain words to the point of being difficult to understand, disorientation in space and time, leaving things in inappropriate places (keys in the fridge), etc.

More than 55 million people worldwide suffer from dementia.

60% to 70% of dementia cases are caused by Alzheimer’s disease.

Gut dysbiosis in pre-clinical Alzheimer’s disease

What role does the gut microbiota play in all this? We already know that in the clinical stage of the disease, patients have an unbalanced gut microbiota. According to a US study published in 2023, this imbalance also exists in the pre-clinical stage and is all the more pronounced the more β-amyloid proteins have accumulated. This imbalance in the gut microbial ecosystem (or dysbiosis) is not linked to diet: future Alzheimer’s patients who do not yet show any signs of dementia have a diet comparable to that of healthy patients who are not slowly succumbing to the disease.

75% of those surveyed were unaware that diseases such as Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, and autism may be linked to microbiota.

Can this help predict the subsequent clinical form of the disease?

The team identified gut bacteria that are generally over- or under-represented in the pre-clinical stage. These bacteria allowed them to use (sidenote: Machine Learning Automatic learning whereby artificial intelligence solves a task based on metagenomic and metabolomic data collected, in this case the identification of discriminating bacterial species. Wazid M, Das AK, Chamola V, et al. Uniting cyber security and machine learning: Advantages, challenges and future research. ICT Express, 2022; 8(3), 313-321. ) to improve their predictive models for Alzheimer’s disease. Admittedly, the gain is small when the initial model incorporates β-amyloid proteins, which are the main pre-clinical signature of Alzheimer’s disease. However, the latter requires lumbar punctures and brain neuroimaging, complex and uncommon procedures. When models are based solely on readily available data (age, sex, hypertension, family history, etc.), the addition of bacterial data from a stool sample improves model (sidenote: Sensitivity The sensitivity of a medical test measures its ability to correctly detect those suffering from a disease (identification of as many sufferers as possible). A sensitivity of close to 100% means the test has little chance of missing cases of a disease, i.e. few false negatives (few undetected true sufferers). Bertrand D, Fluss J, Billard C. Efficacité, sensibilité, spécificité : comparaison de différents tests de lecture. L’Année psychologique, 2010 ; 110, 299-320. ) by 6.8% and (sidenote: Specificity Specificity is the probability that the test will be negative knowing that the subject is healthy. It therefore measures a test’s ability to detect healthy individuals. The closer the specificity is to 1, the fewer the false positives. Bertrand D, Fluss J, Billard C. Efficacité, sensibilité, spécificité : comparaison de différents tests de lecture. L’Année psychologique, 2010 ; 110, 299-320. ) by 27.1%.

This makes it easier to pre-identify at-risk patients, who can then be prescribed more in-depth examinations. If bacteria are indeed the cause of these changes, which has yet to be confirmed, these results also suggest the possibility of modifying the gut microbiota to limit the progression of Alzheimer’s disease.

Alzheimer’s: how the gut makes us lose our head

Learn more
Summary
Off
Sidebar
On
Migrated content
Désactivé
Updated content
Désactivé
Hide image
Off
News

Gut microbiota: an early indicator of Alzheimer’s disease?

Before even the slightest clinical sign of Alzheimer’s disease appears, future sufferers see a change in their gut microbiota. These changes may help identify patients at the pre-clinical stage.

Previous studies have highlighted dysbiosis in the gut microbiota of patients showing symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease. But what about before the first symptoms appear? A team from the University of Washington School of Medicine in the US examined this question by analyzing the microbiota of 164 people aged between 68 and 94 who had no cognitive impairment, but 49 of whom showed (sidenote: Biomarkers Pathogenic β-amyloid (Aβ) and tau proteins measured via positron emission tomography (PET) or by levels in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), markers of neurodegeneration (temporo-parietal hypometabolism, hippocampal atrophy, etc.) identified via CSF and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). ) . The results were unequivocal: the gut microbial taxonomic profiles of the 49 “pre-patients” differed from those of the 115 controls.

55 million More than 55 million people worldwide suffer from dementia.

60% to 70% 60% to 70% of dementia cases are caused by Alzheimer’s disease.

A gut microbiota specific to pre-clinical stages

This dysbiosis correlates with markers of pre-clinical stages of the disease, notably the deposition of β-amyloid plaques in the brain. However, it is not linked to biomarkers of neurodegeneration (temporo-parietal hypometabolism, hippocampal atrophy, etc.). Thus, the gut microbiota seems to change from a very early, asymptomatic stage of the disease.

More specifically, the content of certain bacteria either increases or decreases, including Dorea formicigenerans, which has pro-inflammatory properties, Oscillibacter sp. 57_2, which may be associated with reduced epithelial integrity, anti-inflammatory Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, and to a lesser extent, Coprococcus catus, Anaerostipes hadrus, Methanosphaera stadtmanae, and Ruminococcus lactaris. Some of these gut bacteria may therefore be involved in the causal chain, although further experiments are required to confirm any such causal link and rule out a simple co-occurrence.

10 years An interval of at least 10 years exists between the first deposition of Aβ plaques in the brain and the first clinical signs of impairment.

Simplifying and improving identification of at-risk patients

In any case, this bacterial signature may help improve disease prediction. This is based on a test carried out on a sub-group of 65 patients, where the addition of these bacterial taxa improved the accuracy of predictive models. This improvement is slight (sensitivity +1.5%, specificity +5.0%) when the initial model includes the β-amyloid protein, the main pre-clinical signature of the disease. However, the latter requires complex tests. When models are based solely on readily available data (demographics, clinical covariates, and genetics), the addition of taxonomic characteristics, which require only a stool sample, improves sensitivity by 6.8% and specificity by 27.1%. This makes it easier to pre-identify at-risk patients, who can then be prescribed more in-depth examinations (lumbar puncture and neuroimaging). Lastly, the study could open the door to interventions on the microbiota aimed at limiting the progression of Alzheimer’s disease towards clinical stages.

Summary
Off
Sidebar
On
Migrated content
Désactivé
Updated content
Désactivé
Hide image
Off
News Neurology Gastroenterology

Stroke: gut microbiota directly implicated

A Mendelian randomization study 1 has confirmed the causal effects of gut microbiota on ischemic stroke: certain bacteria have been identified as being able to increase or reduce this risk, opening up the prospect of prevention with probiotics.

Observational studies have one drawback: they cannot distinguish the chicken from the egg, and when it comes to microbiota, they cannot show whether dysbiosis is the cause or consequence of an illness. The solution? Mendelian randomization, named after the famous Austrian botanist Gregor Mendel, who laid the foundations of genetics with a few pea plants.

 

Mendelian randomization

Mendelian randomization is a statistical and genetic approach used in epidemiological research to assess cause-and-effect relationships between an exposure (e.g. a risk factor) and an outcome (e.g. a disease). It is based on the natural genetic variations in people, inherited at random from their parents. Use of this method can make it possible to establish (or refute) a causal link between an exposure (e.g. gut microbiota) and the genetic variants associated with a disease — ischemic stroke (or cerebrovascular accident) — and, more precisely, 3 subtypes: large artery stroke (LAS), small vessel stroke (SVS) and cardioembolic stroke (CES), based on data from the European (sidenote: European Megastroke Consortium: 40,585 stroke cases (including 4,373 LAS, 5,386 SVS and 7,193 CES) and 406,111 controls of European origin.   ) Consortium 2.

2nd Stroke was the 2nd leading cause of death and the 3rd leading cause of disability worldwide in 2016.

70 to 80% 70 to 80% of strokes are ischemic, i.e. caused by the blockage of vessels carrying blood to the brain.

Identification of a handful of gut bacteria

To do this, the Chinese team carried out a Mendelian randomization analysis based on 194 bacterial traits of the European participants in the MiBioGen 3 consortium (18,340 individuals from 24 population cohorts). 

The results from these cohorts show that gut microbiota is not linked to ischemic stroke subtypes. However:

  • 4 bacteria increase the risk of LAS and 5 reduce it;
  • 3 bacteria raise the risk of SVS and 6 decrease it;
  • 4 bacteria amplify the risk of CES and 5 restrict it.

These results suggest a causal effect of the abundance of certain bacteria on the risk of stroke subtypes. In particular, Intestinimonas protects against the risk of LAS and SVS, and the Lachnospiraceae NK4A136 group against SVS and CES. According to the authors, these 2 bacteria could potentially be probiotics capable of mitigating the risk of ischemic stroke through metabolic regulation, if longitudinal studies and clinical trials go on to support their findings.

Recommended by our community

"Thank you for sharing"  -@longphan368 (From Biocodex Microbiota Institute on X)

Summary
Off
Sidebar
On
Migrated content
Désactivé
Updated content
Désactivé
Hide image
Off
News Neurology Gastroenterology

Digital Accessibility

Biocodex Microbiota Institute is committed

Committed to providing the best possible experience for all its users, Biocodex Microbiota Institute is making its website accessible to people with disabilities. We are firmly convinced that the web should be available and accessible to everyone, and we are committed to providing a website that is accessible to as many people as possible, regardless of circumstances and abilities.

In an ongoing effort to optimize, aligned with the group's general policy in favor of diversity, we have partnered with AccessiWay.
Visit AccessiWay's website

With this collaboration, we aim to be part of this civic and supportive approach
for the long term. During this digital transition and with the support of AccessiWay, we commit to
improving the digital accessibility of our website in the coming years.

As of September 22, 2023, the website www.biocodexmicrobiotainstitute.com has a compliance rate of 70.77% according to RGAA 4.1 and is Partially Compliant.

Accessibility statement

View the accessibility statement

What is Digital Accessibility?

Digital accessibility means that people with disabilities can use the Web. More specifically, they can perceive, understand, navigate, and interact with the Web,
and they can contribute to the Web. Digital accessibility also benefits others, especially the elderly, whose abilities may change with age. Web accessibility encompasses all disabilities that affect access, whether they are visual, cognitive, or motor.


An accessible website, for example, allows for:

  • Navigation with voice synthesis and/or a braille display (particularly used by blind and visually impaired people);
  • Customization of the site display according to individual needs (such as enlarging text, changing colors, etc.);
  • Navigation without using a mouse (using the keyboard only, via a touch screen, by voice, or any other adapted device).

For this to be possible, the site must comply with current standards during its. creation and updates.

Navigation Assistance by AccessWidget


AccessWidget enhances site accessibility for users suffering from a wide range of disabilities (blind and visually impaired, people with cognitive disorders, motor
impairments, epilepsy, etc.), in compliance with WCAG 2.2 guidelines, as well as European and French regulations (RGAA 4.1). For this, AccessiWay combines digital accessibility consulting services with an AI-based application that runs in the background to constantly optimize its level of accessibility.


Notable improvements include:

Screen Reader and Keyboard Navigation:

Implementation of WAI-ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) attributes, along with various behavioral modifications, to ensure that blind users visiting
the site with screen readers can read, understand, and take advantage of all the site's features.

Keyboard Navigation Optimization:

The background process also adjusts the website's HTML code and adds various behaviors through JavaScript to make the website keyboard-friendly. This allows users to navigate the site using the Tab and Shift+Tab keys, use dropdown menus with arrow keys, close them with the Esc key, and activate buttons and links using the Enter key.

Activatable Profiles :

Safety Profile for People with Epilepsy: This profile allows people with epilepsy to safely use the website by eliminating the risk of epileptic seizurescaused by flashing animations and risky color combinations.

Profile for Visually Impaired People: This profile adapts the website to beaccessible for the majority of visual impairments, such as deteriorating eyesight,
tunnel vision, cataracts, glaucoma, etc.

Profile Adapted for Cognitive Impairments: This profile provides various assistive features to help users suffering from cognitive disabilities like autism, dyslexia, strokes, and others, to more easily focus on essential elements.

Profile Adapted for Hyperactive People: This profile significantly reduces distractions and noise, aiding people with ADHD and other neurodevelopmental
disorders to navigate, read, and concentrate on essential elements more easily.

Profile Adapted for Blind People (Screen Reader): This profile adapts the website to be compatible with screen readers like JAWS, NVDA, VoiceOver, and TalkBack.

Profile Adapted for Motor Disabilities (Keyboard Navigation): This profile allows people with limited mobility to navigate the website using the keyboard and the Tab, Shift+Tab, and Enter keys. Users can also use shortcuts like "M" (menus), "H" (headings), "F" (forms), "B" (buttons), and "G" (graphics) to access
specific elements.

Additional Adjustments to User Interface, Design, and Readability:

Font Adjustments: Users can increase and decrease font size, change the font family (type), adjust spacing, alignment, and line height, etc.

Color Adjustments: Users can select different contrast color profiles such as light, dark, inverted, and monochrome. Additionally, users can switch color schemes for titles, texts, and backgrounds, with more than seven different coloration options.

Animations: Users with epilepsy can stop all ongoing animations by clicking a button. Animations controlled by the interface include videos, GIFs, and flashing
CSS transitions.

Content Highlighting: Users can opt to highlight important elements like links and titles. They can also choose to highlight only the targeted or hovered-over
elements.

Audio Mute: Users with hearing aids may experience headaches or other issues due to autoplaying audio. This option allows users to instantly mute the entire
website.

Cognitive Disorders: AccessiWay utilizes a search engine linked to Wikipedia and Wiktionary, allowing individuals with cognitive impairments to decipher the
meaning of sentences, acronyms, slang, etc.

Additional Features: AccessiWay offers users the option to modify the cursor's color and size, use a print mode, enable a virtual keyboard, and many other
functions.

Feedback and Contact

 

If you are unable to access content or a service, send a message to contact@biocodexmicrobiotainstitute.com to be directed to an accessible alternative or to obtain the content in another form.

 

Recourse Options


Use this procedure in the following case:
You have reported an accessibility issue to the website manager that prevents you from accessing content or one of the services on the portal, and you have not received a satisfactory response.

  • Write a message to the Rights Defender: https://formulaire.defenseurdesdroits.fr/
  • Contact the regional delegate of the Rights Defender: https://www.defenseurdesdroits.fr/saisir/delegues
  • Send a letter by mail (free, no postage required)

Rights Defender
Free reply 71120
75342 Paris CEDEX 07

Summary
On
Sidebar
Off
Migrated content
Désactivé
Updated content
Désactivé
Hide image
Off
Article

Accessibility statement

Biocodex Microbiota Institute is committed

Biocodex Microbiota Institute is committed to making its internet, intranet, extranet sites, and software accessible (as well as its mobile applications) in accordance with Article 47 of Law No. 2005-102 of February 11, 2005. We value inclusion and diversity, and we ensure that our website: https://www.biocodexmicrobiotainstitute.com is accessible to everyone, including people with disabilities.

In this digital accessibility initiative, we are proud to collaborate with Accessiway.

We are firmly committed to a web for all. With a long-term and responsible vision, we aim to fully meet regulatory requirements, including the General Accessibility Improvement Framework (RGAA) 4.1.

To this end, Biocodex Microbiota Institute implements the following strategy and actions:

  • Multi-year Accessibility Plan 2023-2024: In progress.
  • Action Plan 2023-2024: In progress.

Compliance status

The website: https://www.biocodexmicrobiotainstitute.com has an accessibility rate of 70.77%

It is therefore Partially Compliant with the General Accessibility Improvement Framework (RGAA), Version 4, due to the non-compliance and exemptions listed below.

Test Results

The compliance audit conducted on September 20, 2023, by AccessiWay reveals that 70.77% of the criteria of RGAA Version 4 are met; Details of the results:

  • Number of compliant criteria: 41
  • Number of non-compliant criteria: 24
  • Number of non-applicable criteria: 41

Inaccessible Content

Criteria
  • 1.1: Does every informative image have a textual alternative?
  • 1.2: Is each decorative image correctly ignored by assistive technologies?
  • 1.3: For each informative image that has a textual alternative, is the alternative relevant (except in special cases)?
  • 1.8: Should every text image that conveys information, in the absence of a replacement mechanism, be replaced by styled text whenever possible? Is this rule followed (except in special cases)?
  • 2.1: Does each frame have a frame title?
  • 3.1: On each web page, is the information not solely conveyed by color? Is this rule followed?
  • 3.2: On each web page, is the contrast between the text color and its background color high enough (except in special cases)?
  • 3.3: On each web page, are the colors used in interface components or informative graphical elements sufficiently contrasting (except in special cases)?
  • 6.1: Is each link explicit (except in special cases)?
  • 7.1: Is each script, if necessary, compatible with assistive technologies?
  • 7.3: Is each script controllable by the keyboard and any pointing device (except in special cases)?
  • 7.5: On each web page, are status messages correctly conveyed by assistivetechnologies?
  • 8.2: For each web page, is the generated source code valid according to the specified document type (except in special cases)?
  • 8.8: On each web page, is the language code for each language change valid and relevant?
  • 9.1: On each web page, is the information structured through the appropriate use of titles?
  • 9.2: On each web page, is the document structure coherent (except in special cases)?
  • 9.4: On each web page, is every quote correctly indicated?
  • 10.4: On each web page, does the text remain readable when the font size is increased to at least 200% (except in special cases)?
  • 10.7: On each web page, for each element that receives focus, is the focus visibly
    captured?
  • 11.1: Does each form field have a label?
  • 12.2: In each set of pages, are the menu and navigation bars always in the same
    place (except in special cases)?
  • 12.8: On each web page, is the tabulation order coherent?
  • 13.2: On each web page, is opening a new window not triggered without user
    action? Is this rule followed?
  • 13.4: For each office document that has an accessible version, does this version
    provide the same information?

Exemptions for Disproportionate Burden

No content to mention

 

Contents Not Subject to Accessibility Obligation

No content to mention

 

Establishment of this Accessibility Statement

This statement was established on September 20, 2023.

 

Technologies Used for the Site

 

  • HTML5
  • CSS
  • Javascript

Testing Environment

Operating Systems
  • Apple Mac Os X 13.4
  • Microsoft Windows 11
  • Apple Ios 16
  • Google Android 13
Browsers and Software

In the latest versions available on different operating systems:

  • Google Chrome
  • Windows Edge
  • Safari
  • Brave
  • Adobe Acrobat Reader / Preview on Mac (for PDFs only)

Tools for Evaluating Accessibility

Tools
  • Mouse emulators, screen magnifiers, and on-screen keyboards for different systems.
  • VoiceOver (Apple systems only)
  • TalkBack (Android only)
  • NVDA 2023 and Freedom Scientific JAWS 2022 (PC systems only)
  • Tanaguru WebExt RGAA4
  • Assistant RGAA
  • Graphic evaluation tools available on different systems (colors, contrasts, subtitles, etc.)

Pages of the Site Subject to Compliance Verification

Feedback and Contact

If you are unable to access any content or service, you can contact the person responsible for Biocodex Microbiota Institute to be directed to an accessible alternative or to obtain the content in another form.

Send a message to contact@biocodexmicrobiotainstitute.com

Recourse

If you notice an accessibility defect that prevents you from accessing content or a feature of the site, you report it to us, and you do not receive a response, you have the right to file complaints or a request for referral to the Defender of Rights.

Several Means are at Your Disposal:

  • Write a message to the Defender of Rights
  • Contact the Defender of Rights' delegate in your region
  • Send a letter by mail (free, no stamp required)

 

Defender of Rights Free Reply
71120 75342 Paris CEDEX 07

Summary
On
Sidebar
Off
Migrated content
Désactivé
Updated content
Désactivé
Hide image
Off
Article

Is there a link between miscarriage and the vaginal microbiota?

It's a fairytale-like story: once upon a time, a young woman who was unable to have children and suffered repeated miscarriages received a gift of vaginal microbiota. She then became pregnant a gave birth to a healthy baby.

The vaginal microbiota

The use of any medicinal products is highly regulated and requires marketing authorization. However, in very rare cases, it is possible to benefit from a last-chance waiver known as "compassionate access". This allows medicinal products to be used without marketing authorization to treat serious or rare diseases for which there is no cure whereas time is running out. A young 30-year-old mother who had suffered a series of pregnancy losses since the birth of her first child, some of them very late (up to 6 months into the pregnancy), was able to obtain a vaginal microbiota transplant after having obtained such access. In other words, healthy microbiota from a female donor was deposited in her vagina in September 2021.

Only 1 in 2 women knows exactly what vaginal flora is (49%) and only 1 in 5 claim to know the exact meaning of the term "vaginal microbiota" (21%).

Use of VMT to treat vaginal dysbiosis

But why? Because this young mother had a very unbalanced vaginal microbiota, dominated not by beneficial (sidenote: Lactobacilli Rod-shaped bacteria whose main characteristic is the production of lactic acid, from where they get the name “lactic acid bacteria”.  Lactobacilli are present in the oral, vaginal and gut microbiota of humans, but also in plants and animals. They are found in fermented foods, such as dairy products (e.g. certain cheeses and yoghurts), pickles, sauerkraut, etc. Lactobacilli are also found in probiotics, with certain species recognized for their beneficial properties.   W. H. Holzapfel et B. J. Wood, The Genera of Lactic Acid Bacteria, 2, Springer-Verlag, 1st ed. 1995 (2012), 411 p. « The genus Lactobacillus par W. P. Hammes, R. F. Vogel Tannock GW. A special fondness for lactobacilli. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Jun;70(6):3189-94. Smith TJ, Rigassio-Radler D, Denmark R, et al. Effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus LGG® and Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. lactis BB-12® on health-related quality of life in college students affected by upper respiratory infections. Br J Nutr. 2013 Jun;109(11):1999-2007. ) , as is the case in a healthy vagina, but by the dreaded Gardnerella spp. bacteria, which explains her nine years of itching and abundant, yellow/green, foul-smelling vaginal discharge, which worsened during her attempts to become pregnant and resisted all attempts at treatment...

 A pregnancy carried to term

The graft seems to have taken hold very quickly. The dysbiosis and its symptoms disappeared and lactobacilli similar to those of the donor largely colonized the recipient's vagina. In February 2022, the patient became pregnant naturally and the lactobacilli were still living peacefully in her vagina. The only fly in the ointment was the return of Gardnerella spp. in the sixth week of pregnancy. This did not worry the researchers as a second vaginal microbiota transplant was initially planned for two weeks later. However, this transplant was ultimately canceled as the lactobacilli had regained the upper hand on the day of the procedure. And as all's well that ends well, a full-term perfectly healthy baby boy was born via planned cesarean section.

There is more than one kind of transplant....

You’ve probably heard of fecal microbiota transplant (FMT)... And now there is another one, namely vaginal microbiota transplant! In 2019, U.S. researchers laid the groundwork for trials of vaginal microbiota transplantation (VMT) to treat bacterial vaginosis. To test the hypothesis that VMT could be a more effective treatment option, the scientists developed a universal screening approach for 20 women aged 23 to 35. What was their goal? To select donors to find those with a minimal risk of pathogen transmission and "optimal" vaginal microbiota for transplantation

It is nevertheless important not to jump to conclusions or to believe that vaginal microbiota transplantation represents a miracle cure for female infertility. This was just one case, and the patient had another illness that causes miscarriages and whose treatment could explain, in part or in whole, the success of this pregnancy. Put another way, while we shouldn't disregard the results of this case study, we shouldn't get too carried away either.

Vaginal and gut microbiota transplantations can present health risks and must be carried out under medical supervision. Do not try to do them at home!

The vaginal microbiota

Learn more
Summary
Off
Sidebar
On
Migrated content
Désactivé
Updated content
Désactivé
Hide image
Off
News

Fusobacterium to blame for endometriosis?

Could a simple antibiotic treatment be some day enough to cure endometriosis? So suggests a Japanese study published in 2023, which points the finger at Fusobacterium for the genesis of the disease.

Endometriosis affects 10% to 15% of women of childbearing age, resulting in chronic pain, hypofertility, and even infertility. Several hypotheses about what causes the disease have been put forward, most notably retrograde menstruation. However, other mechanisms have not been ruled out.  According to the work of a Japanese team, the microbiota of the uterine cavity may be involved, in particular the bacterial genus Fusobacterium, a pro-inflammatory opportunistic pathogen.

1 in 10 It is estimated that 1 in 10 women suffers from endometriosis.

49% Only 1 in 2 women know what the vaginal flora is exactly

Fusobacterium: the cause of an inflammatory response?

Analyses of tissues collected during hysterectomy from 79 patients suffering from endometriosis revealed a greater presence of bacteria from the genus Fusobacterium in the uterine endometrium and ovarian fibroblasts compared with 76 controls not suffering from endometriosis (samples taken during surgery for cervical dysplasia, adenomyosis, etc.). Fusobacterium was present in the endometrium of 64.3% of patients with endometriosis, compared with 7.1% for healthy controls.

In addition, vaginal samples showed an increased abundance of this bacterium in the vaginal area of women suffering from endometriosis. This supports the existing hypothesis that the vaginal microbiota plays a role in the pathogenesis of the disease, bearing in mind that the digestive microbiota also appears to be involved.

Vaginal inoculation of bacteria

Moreover, vaginal inoculation of Fusobacterium in a mouse model of endometriosis resulted in a marked increase in fibroblasts and an increase in the number and weight of lesions, in contrast to inoculation with other bacteria, such as Lactobacillus iners or Escherichia coli

Further studies have led the authors to propose the following scenario: infection of endometrial cells by Fusobacterium leads to the production of the growth factor TGF-β1 by macrophages, which in turn induces the transition of fibroblasts from a quiescent state to an activated state in which they express a cytoplasmic protein called transgelin (TAGLN), which then promotes the proliferation, migration, and adhesion of these fibroblasts outside the endometrium. This mechanism appears to be validated in humans: TAGLN is also over-expressed in patients’ fibroblasts, promoting their proliferation and motility.

An antibiotic treatment?

Lastly, the researchers tested a broad-spectrum vaginal antibiotic treatment (metronidazole and chloramphenicol) on animals over 21 days with the aim of eradicating F. nucleatum. Administered when the mice were inoculated with Fusobacterium or subsequently (when the lesions had grown), the treatment limited F. nucleatum, TGF-β1 and TAGLN expression and reduced the number and weight of lesions. Hope for a future approach to treating endometriosis? A clinical trial underway in 2023 aims to reveal what impact antibiotics have on women suffering from endometriosis. The results may one day make it possible to prescribe antibiotics to patients with endometriosis who are infected with Fusobacterium.

Recommended by our community

"Interesting....!"  -@sathr21 (From Biocodex Microbiota Institute on X)

Summary
Off
Sidebar
On
Migrated content
Désactivé
Updated content
Désactivé
Hide image
Off
News

A bacterium to blame for endometriosis?

Endometriosis is known to leave young girls and women bedridden during each menstrual cycle. However, this could soon become a distant memory. So suggests a Japanese study 1 published in 2023.

Vaginal Microbiota #11

A significant new hope has arisen for all women suffering from (sidenote: Endometriosis Endometriosis is a chronic gynecological disease linked to the presence of tissue similar to the uterine mucosa outside the uterine cavity, particularly in the peritoneum and ovaries. ) : a bacterium of the (sidenote: Fusobacterium Fusobacterium is a genus of filamentous bacteria that lives in the mouth (dental plaque), digestive system, vagina and, to a lesser extent, the uterine cavity. This pathogenic bacterium is implicated in periodontitis (inflammation at the base of the tooth) and colorectal cancer. ) genus may be involved, representing a potential target for treatment. In particular, a simple course of antibiotics may be enough to make this pathogenic bacterium retreat, reducing the painful lesions.

1 in 10 women is affected by endometriosis, which rises to 1 in 7 or 1 in 5 for women of childbearing age.

Almost half of women do not know exactly what the vaginal flora is.

(sidenote: 1. Kvaskoff M. Epidémiologie de l’endométriose. In : Petit E, Lhuillery D, Loriau J, Sauvanet E. Endométriose : Diagnostic et prise en charge. Issy-les-Moulineaux : Elsevier Masson ; 2020. P.9-14.    2. https://www.biocodexmicrobiotainstitute.com/en/international-microbiota-observatory-focus-women-health )

Bacterial effect countered by an antibiotic

Japanese researchers from Nagoya University 2  have shown that, in laboratory mice used as a model, vaginal inoculation with bacteria from the genus Fusobacterium induced lesions typical of endometriosis, which were more numerous and more severe than in control mice.  This suggests that Fusobacterium is involved in the genesis of the disease; but it also leads to possible solutions. Indeed, antibiotic treatment targeting Fusobacterium reduced the number and weight of lesions in the mice. This discovery raises the hope that this antibiotic treatment may also be effective in women.

“Eradication of this bacterium by antibiotic treatment could be an approach to treat endometriosis for women who are positive for Fusobacteria infection, and such women could be easily identified by vaginal swab or uterus swab.”

Prof. Yutaka Kondo of Nagoya University, lead author of the study

Analysis of the mechanisms at play

But that’s not all. The Japanese team carried out numerous experiments to try and understand the mechanisms involved. This meticulous work led to the following hypothesis: the presence of Fusobacteria in the uterus activates the women’s immune system, provoking a cascade of reactions that leads to the production of a protein called transgelin, which in turn promotes the development of endometriosis.

Endometriosis and microbiota: is there a link?

Learn more

Clinical study underway

The involvement of the microbiota in endometriosis has been suspected for some time. For example, analyses of the vaginal flora have been used to predict the severity of the disease, while 90% of women affected by endometriosis also have associated digestive disorders (irritable bowel syndrome in particular). Nevertheless, these new results were sufficiently promising for the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Nagoya University Hospital to launch a clinical study in 2023 3 into the use of an antibiotic.

Pending the results, please do not take antibiotics without a prescription or medical advice. If used incorrectly, you may reduce their effectiveness for when you really need them.

Antibiotics

Antibiotics should be used with caution and only on the basis of medical advice 4 .

Summary
Off
Sidebar
On
Migrated content
Désactivé
Updated content
Désactivé
Hide image
Off
News